Black and White Program

What Iraq, Afghanistan, and the War on Terror Has Cost

September 19th, 2008 by Kyle Rankin

Be Sociable, Share!

The U.S. Congress system for funding operates with an appropriations-funding method. In this system, first a budget or request for funding is submitted, and then, if appropriations are approved, the requisition is funded. A point of measure since September of 2001 reveals that the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the general war on terrorism has been quite costly— approximately $858 billion has been appropriated, and actually $771 billion funded. This amount includes military, diplomatic, veterans benefits, and some services for these specific regions. On average, Congress has provided funding of $93 billion per year from 2003 until 2005. In 2006, the numbers shot up to $121 billion, again being toppled in 2007 with $171 billion. 2008 delivered yet another increase to 186 billion. Projections for the first quarter of 2009 are currently at $68 billion.
Funding for Military Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and for Other Activities Related to the War on Terrorism, 2008 and 2009

The Department of Defense (DoD) has been the primary directive of the funding with a total of $810 billion appropriated since September 2001 for defense operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and for the war on terrorism. As part of the use of such funding, the DoD spent $38 billion on equipping and training security forces Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq Relief and Reconstruction has totaled $16 billion in appropriations, and $46 billion has been provided for diplomatic operations and foreign aid to Iraq, Afghanistan, and other countries that are assisting the United States in the war on terrorism.

$11 Billion Per month

The DoD reports that in 2008, obligations for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and for other activities related to the war on terrorism have averaged about $11 billion per month. The reports are current up to June of 2008, the last month of information available for the 2008 fiscal year. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) expects that monthly obligations will increase during the last quarter of this fiscal year.
Funding for Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and for Other Activities

The Three Directives

The funding for project Operation Iraqi Freedom accounts for approximately 82 percent of all reported obligations in 2008— down from 85 percent in 2007 due to an accounting period adjustment.

The U.S. contribution to the war in Afghanistan, Operation Enduring Freedom, accounts for another 18 percent.

Combat air patrols over Washington, D.C., and New York City and general security measures associated with protecting stateside citizens and officials, known as Operation Noble account for less than 1 percent.

An Educated Guess

The Congressional Budget Office– Budget and Economic Outlook Update indicates that reporting on specifics of spending of the DoD is difficult because most appropriations for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and for other activities related to the war on terrorism appear in the same budget accounts that record appropriations as DoD’s other functions as well.
However, an educated guess would be that outlays for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan amounted to approximately $120 billion last year. And in 2008 operations will total about $145 billion, in CBO’s estimation.


Be Sociable, Share!
Pages:

3 responses so far.

  • james shadeest - Sep 19, 2008 at 1:15 pm

    Great. A $145 Billion here, $200 Billion for AIG & Uncle Freddie and Aunt Fannie, all I’m sure financed by China. The United States of Asia or The United States of China………wonder if when they forclose someday we will have a vote on that one?

  • John Maszka - Sep 19, 2008 at 8:40 pm

    The War on Terrorism is a Lie

    The war on terrorism is a lie because terrorism is not an enemy, it is a strategy.

    Terrorism is a strategy employed by weaker states and non-state actors when fighting an asymmetric war against a more powerful opponent.

    No state or non-state actor fights a conventional war against an enemy it has no chance of defeating conventionally; hence it fights asymmetrically. In other words, it employs the tactic of terrorism.

    Since the U.S. has declared that it will maintain military superiority without challenge, it has done everything in its power to do just that. The US defense budget for 2008 is some $700 billion. There is no single state or non-state actor on this planet that can defeat the United States in a conventional war.

    Therefore, any single state or non-state actor that will not accept American hegemony will be forced to fight an asymmetric war with the United States. That is, it will be forced to employ terrorism. The war on terrorism is a war against any state or non-state actor not willing to accept US hegemony. It is not a war on terrorism at all, but a war to promote and defend US imperialism.

  • Ideal population - Colorado (CO) - Page 2 - City-Data Forum - May 8, 2009 at 3:27 am

    [...] and the Population Problem 7( Determining Sustainable Population Levels using Footprint Data 8) What Iraq, Afghanistan, and the War on Terror Has Cost | Black and White 9( https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat…k/geos/pk.html 10) FOOD, LAND, POPULATION and the U.S. [...]

Leave a Comment