Black and White Program

I Don’t Want To Talk To You Either … At Least Not Right Now

January 8th, 2008 by John Eastman

Be Sociable, Share!

A widely published Reuters news service article entitled “Iran Leader Suggests U.S. Ties Possible in Future” indicated that Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei stated that restoring ties with the United States now would harm the Islamic state, but that he would not rule it out in the future (Reuters, January 3, 2008). Further high points from his speech included statements that he would be the first one to approve a diplomatic relationship with the U.S. when it was useful to do so, in addition to his consistent declaration that Iran will not suspend atomic work so it can generate its own electricity, something that the U.S. claims is really geared towards developing atomic weaponry. In addition, Khamenei indicated that the example of Iraq showed that the U.S. would remain a “danger” even if the two countries developed diplomatic relations.

Ali Khamenei does not speak publicly often, and his communication seems to rarely make it into the U.S. media. Most of Iran’s political statements are funneled through Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has a history of spreading controversial rhetoric about the U.S.

Here are a few points of interest:

After the release of a recent National Intelligence Report (NIE) indicating that Iran ceased developing a nuclear weapon, Ahmadinejad demanded an apology, and furthermore suggested that Iran was ready for discussions with all nations, including the U.S. It is unlikely that he misspoke or was misinterpreted.

The U.S. government reacted strongly to Ahmadinejad’s statements about Israel, nuclear power and a weapons program. In fact, it is the basis of the Bush administration’s call to a possible military conflict with Iran. Yet Khamenei’s speech clearly indicates that any relationship or action is the call of the supreme leader, not president Ahmadinejad’s. This theory that Ahmadinejad’s power is severely limited is not a new one and has been well publicized before in the U.S. media. Yet his statements have caused frequent talks of a possible invasion. Where is the U.S. logic here?

The Bush administration policy has been to not talk to Iran— unless you count recent talks specifically regarding Iraq— until they come clean about their past weapons development program and cease enrichment of uranium. This is well documented in the media via speeches from President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

Part of the U.S. strategy with regards to United Nations sanctions has been to isolate Iran from the rest of the modern world, pushing it into acceptance of terms and conditions amendable to the West’s policies. The American public has had the impression that it is the U.S. that will not engage in diplomatic talks, yet we see Iran really has no desire to speak to us either. In fact, they think that we are dangerous.

Clearly though, Iran is talking to China, Germany and Russia as reference in the numerous economic and trade deals of late, prompting a thought— who is really isolated here?

One also has to wonder if there could be diplomatic backdoor conversations going on between the two countries that the media and public are not privy to. One would hope that this is the case. It was often rumored that the U.S. and Russia always maintained unofficial back channel communications during the Cold War, and even rumored that U.S. and Cuba communicated for years during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Posturing from the heads of state of these governments prevents the core of these discussions to be revealed.

While you could chalk all of this up to propaganda from both sides, and maybe relax a bit on that thought, you should consider the possibility that one side, the U.S, is basing its military plans and foreign policy decisions on reaction from the other, and furthermore, reacts to propaganda from a powerless president.

1Z0-804  
70-347  
300-101  
300-208  
70-178  
70-413  
NSE4  
300-115  
MB2-704  
400-201  
350-018  
220-802  
PMP  
101  
NS0-157  
200-310  
MB2-704  
HP0-S42  
PEGACPBA71V1  
101  
000-106  
300-075  
AWS-SYSOPS  
400-051  
300-115  
70-533  
9A0-385  
MB5-705  
C_TFIN52_66  
640-911  
70-462  
AWS-SYSOPS  
350-029  
70-270  
NSE4  
LX0-103  
N10-006  
70-534  
400-051  
70-412  
70-483  
1Z0-061  
2V0-621D  
300-070  
JN0-360  
CISM  
HP0-S42  
1z0-434  
SY0-401  
CAS-002  

Be Sociable, Share!
Pages:

0 responses so far.

Leave a Comment